
Librarian: Tidy Up the Arcane Library!
Price History
Past 36 months · Updated dailyPrices cover Steam and 39 authorized stores; only legitimate offers are counted. The chart shows weekly market-wide lows and Steam's official price across the past 36 months.
01About Librarian: Tidy Up the Arcane Library!
A magical library is in disarray, with 3,072 books waiting to be put back. Sort them from a first-person view, using titles and cover designs to find the right sections. Progress unlocks spells that help locate matching volumes, summon them to hand, or shelve books automatically. On Steam, 94%% of 25,679 reviews are positive.
Credits
Lowest recorded in 36 months
$5.092026-04-30 · SteamBase game · same records as the chart above; USD history, not a regional Steam low.Language support
| Language | Interface | Subtitles | Audio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simplified Chinese | Yes | Yes | — |
| Traditional Chinese | Yes | Yes | — |
| English | Yes | Yes | — |
Show 1 more languages
| Language | Interface | Subtitles | Audio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japanese | Yes | Yes | — |
Steam PC edition data · 2026-10-19
02Before you buy
Single-player sorting
This is a single-player simulation about sorting 3,072 books into library sections using clues from titles and covers. As you progress, you unlock spells that make organizing more efficient.
Controller and languages
The Steam PC version has full controller support. Listed interface languages are English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and Russian, with subtitles listed for them; full audio is not listed.
03Frequently asked questions
What do you do in the game?
Sort scattered books into the correct library sections using clues from their titles and covers.
What abilities can you unlock?
You can unlock spells that summon other books in a series, highlight matching volumes, or shelve books in your hands automatically.
How does the evaluation work?
The Principal evaluates how many rows are shelved according to the rules; accuracy and speed matter for a top evaluation.
Popular Steam reviews
Native-language selection · 10 reviewsSelected helpful reviews in this language show both recommendations and criticisms. This selection does not represent the overall positive rating; opinions reflect the version reviewed.
I was excited to try the game but the only way to know if you place a book correctly is by it's color on the shelf. It is either red or green and as a colorblind person I can't differentiate both colors. A colorblind mode would be pretty great, I'll have to try it later I guess.Show moreShow less
I've played this game a few times through and really enjoyed it. Its kinda therapeutic and a good way to relax after playing more competitive games. Would love to see maybe a second library that is way bigger and have the capability to play with friendsShow moreShow less
This is a really fun little game. I'm probably going to continue playing it since it scratches a certain itch in my neurodivergent brain. However I can't in good conscience recommend it now that I've found out that the devs used genAI in a few assets. I can understand using it for grammar if english isn't your first language, english is super hard and most translators nowadays are genAI, it's kind of inescapable. But there's really no need to use genAI for art to put on the walls. The 3 art pieces in question are bland-looking landscapes with the telltale yellow filter genAI art tends to have. Stock images could have been used, and the art doesn't really add anything to the game. I can't speak for others but I wouldn't have noticed if there were no paintings on the walls, I'm just here to sort books and put them away. genAI has caused a lot of problems lately, not least of which is driving the price of computer components through the roof, not to mention the negative impact of datacenters. I hope the devs reconsider using genAI art in the future.Show moreShow less
This game requires a particular brand of autism. I happen to have this particular brand of autism. Completing a 22hr no magic run was cathartic. 10/10. No notes. Buy this gameShow moreShow less
I did not notice the AI disclosure message before buying this game, otherwise i would not have bought it. I've issued a refund now, after i noticed some glaring signs of AI in the game itself. On that note, I am fairly certain that the devs are lying in their AI disclosure. They state "AI helped with grammatical corrections for in-game text, which were then carefully reviewed and adjusted by hand", however a lot of the book covers either have mistakes in them or just are straight up missing words, which means they either didnt review the books by hand, or didnt care about correcting the mistakes. Stop using AI in video games Edit: I've gotten an insane amount of comments, and although I couldnt care less about the people berating me for not liking generative AI in creative spaces, I don't appreciate being called a liar. People are claiming that I'm lying about there being a few missing words or mistakes on the book covers, so let me offer a few examples i've been able to find by just watching a random youtube video about the game: - "Formation and Maintenance of Large Sacred Barriers" is the supposed title (on hovering the book) -> on the book cover it says "Formation & Maintenance *and* Large Sacred Barriers" - "Healing Magic for the Reclamation of Mind and Consciousness" -> on the cover the "and" is missing, simply stating "Mind Consciousness" - "The Book of Arcane Bows: Magic Infused Arrows" -> the "of" is missing on the cover, simply saying "The Book Arcane Bows" I've barely looked for books with mistakes for about 15 minutes and could already cherry pick these 3 to make my point, which at that point I think it's safe to assume there are a lot more book covers with mistakes on them. I realize these are minutiae, but if you claim that gen AI is this next big think that will replace all of us, it better also produce products that are actually well crafted.Show moreShow less
This game had my full attention for over 13 hours (completed without using magic). I really hope Dev's expand this game, perhaps new maps or things to tidy because I absolutely enjoyed every minute of organising books to their correct shelves. For around a fiver, this is worth every penny! 10/10 Now if only my love of tidying the library could translate to tidying my room.Show moreShow less
I was excited about the concept of this game, but I had to refund it upon finding out that AI art was used. There's no need to use it at all, especially if it's claimed to only be for tiny parts of the game map, surely those pieces of art could be commissioned from an actual human artist.Show moreShow less
I'm going to comment here in two forms, sort of. One, to discuss this game as it is on its own merits. Two, to discuss the evident use of AI in this game and my general thoughts around that. First, the game. I've been thinking about this quite a bit recently, now that I've completed the puzzle and put the books back in order. A few thoughts come to mind - Librarian: Tidy Up the Arcane Library! (what a mouthful, lets call this L:TU) is a title that would be best appreciated by gamers who enjoy those 'search out' games, like 'find the cats in the scene' games. It'd also likely be appreciated by people who enjoy putting together jigsaw puzzles. There's a very low-intensity whimsy here in seeking out book titles that is suprisingly addictive. But then, as I was playing, I was appreciating this game and I knew that this game wouldn't be for everyone. I'm here actually enjoying myself, but then again, I give Lawn Simulator a 10/10. But I digress, slightly. The gameplay itself is an FPS experience that can be played on keyboard/mouse or with a controller - I chose the latter. There are ~3000 books that need to be shelved, each one in it's own section, and each section having book sets of 3, 5, and 10 books. They're organized by color, shape, naming convention and subject (by floor). In order to get the full appreciation of all of this you're going to require a few things. First, you're going to have to not be colour blind. If you are, forget it. Or at least know you're going to be be playing with a significant, but not insurpassable, experience. Second, you're going to have to have a very strong command of the English language and to appreciate how the book, "Rules and Regulations for a Multi-Classed Adventurers Party" belongs in the "Jurisprudence" section, where as "Everyone's Dwarvish: Common Introductions" belongs in the "Languages" section. At first the game is slow, while you're absolutely lost and trying to find books in sequence, desparetly hoping to complete a row. The more rows you complete, the more experience you gain, which can then be spent on spells. The spells are the part that instantly make the searching component bareable, as these are game changers in speeding up the process. They'll provide the ability to highlight books, bring books in to your hand, organize them in your hands, and place them on the shelves automatically. Pretty soon the process has gone from painstaking to actually sorta kinda fun somehow. The whole thing's over in around 5 hours, probably less if you're faster than me, and you probably will be. There's a, in my opinion, very pleasant reward for completing the task that's very reminiscent of Disney's Fantasia cartoons, and I'll leave it at that. Now, the AI part. (Some of) the reviews are staunchly anti-AI and I appreciate that. I do. If you feel strongly about AI, and you should, and if that's enough to put you off this game, then I appreciate that too. It's a modern, polarizing topic. In this game, it feels quite clear to me that the AI was used to create book titles as well as differentiate book covers themselves. It's done with good effect, and I don't believe there's any direct 'stealing' or plagarizing of public works here, however, it's also pretty lazy. There's a sort of laziness behind it, and behind the use of AI in this game. I think the AI is used in the most inoffensive way possible here in 2026, but it will offend people nonetheless, and quite honestly I can agree with them to a point: AI didn't need to be used here, just more time for real humans to provide real content. The game itself is a fun, lighthearted and enjoyable experience and quite honestly I would love to do this again, more of it, bigger libraries, crazier books, maybe open a book or two, but I would like it done with human content, human titles, I'd like to see more use of human art in the next iteration. So it's a thumbs up here, but it teeters on the precipise of thumbs down, not only because AI feels very much leaned-on in this project, but also because I don't really think it was necessary - just more thought and time required to build more assets. But it's primarily a thumbs-up because I enjoyed the game, and that's what it's about. But also, guys, I enjoyed Lawn Simulator.Show moreShow less
I am very disappointed with the delayed AI disclaimer and to be honest, I do not believe they are being honest about the extent of the GEN AI usage. I am saddened it took me so long to catch on, but the feeling that everything is the game was designed in a sort of odd and meaningless way (very much felt generated, not creatively thought up) turned into the realization that what seemed like a very unique idea was actually a mediocre execution using gen AI and it's proclivity for theft. If you had made this without gen AI not only would it be much higher quality (books would feel purposeful, there could be more interwoven creativity) and I would be happy to have played it. Instead I am sorely disappointed.Show moreShow less
Source: original Steam user reviews. Helpful votes are an archived snapshot, not live data. Last collected: 08/15/2026.