"Peak Learning Future" Surpasses 6 Million Views in 5 Hours After Resuming Broadcast — Has Wu Liang Regained Stability?

Viewed from the perspective of gaming media, this news actually feels a lot like the “first public test after a project got a second lease on life.” At 7 a.m. on April 7, the official account under Fengxue Future, “Zhang Xuefeng Team Talks Higher Education Planning,” resumed livestreaming, with General Manager Wu Liang appearing on camera in person. This move itself carried a strong message of stabilizing morale. The question was not just whether the stream would return, but more importantly who would host it, how it would be handled, and whether they would dare to directly address outside doubts. This time, Wu Liang clearly chose the most straightforward approach.

Based on the information available, Wu Liang further posted around noon on April 9, confirming that the official Fengxue Weilai livestream room had resumed regular streaming starting from April 7, and that many parents and outside supporters had recently come by to show their support and stay with them. The follow-up arrangements he laid out were also quite clear: he would remain active in the livestream room for communication, continue sharing higher education planning content on Weibo, and keep answering questions through offline lectures. In the content service industry, this combination of “high-frequency online reach + offline trust reinforcement” is a highly practical retention strategy.

The livestream data also shows that this return broadcast at least achieved its first-stage goal. Third-party platforms indicate that the account drew over 6 million views in 5 hours, with peak concurrent viewers surpassing 130,000. This level of attention was no ordinary return stream, but rather a public stress test under concentrated outside scrutiny. More importantly, Wu Liang not only responded to questions about the company’s operating situation during the stream, but also connected with parents live for direct interaction. This was more effective than a one-way statement, because educational services, much like many indie game communities, ultimately depend on continuous feedback and genuine communication.

To address the points most easily confused by outsiders recently, Wu Liang also specifically explained that both “Fengxue Weilai” and “Fengxue Future” are names currently used by the company. He also emphasized that among the teacher accounts under its umbrella, any account carrying the MCN “Fengxue Future” label is an officially verified account. This step is a lot like giving a player community a “guide to the official server entrance”: only by first making the identity system and official channels clear can trust from being diverted be avoided. As for the continuity issue that outsiders care about most, he offered only one very firm statement: “We will definitely keep going.”

From a broader trend perspective, the value of this resumed livestream is not just that it served as a response to public opinion, but that content-based educational institutions are once again trying to prove whether they can continue operating without relying on a single star IP. The article mentions that some netizens see Wu Liang as Zhang Xuefeng’s successor, and that his style is also considered fairly similar, which certainly helps stabilize sentiment during the transition period. But what will truly determine the path ahead is still whether the team can continue delivering services that are “professional, rigorous, and sincere,” rather than simply living off the momentum of one high-profile livestream. For parents, what deserves the closest attention next is not the traffic peak, but the quality of the content after the stream, the efficiency of the Q&A, and the ability to deliver consistently over the long term.