底特律:化身为人

底特律:化身为人

《底特律:化身為人》以改變三名仿生人命運與城市未來的選擇為核心。以 Kinguin 標價 ≈ HK$47.93 入手時,可衡量預算及重玩不同劇情分支的意願。Steam 玩家好評率為 96%%,共 228,750 則評價,可供你判斷這種由選擇推動的敘事是否合胃口。 與 Steam 目前價格 HK$248.00 相比,此優惠購買Standard可省下 ≈ HK$200.07。

正在取得全網報價
96%Steam 玩家評分22.9萬 則評價80Metacritic/10079OpenCritic/100
發售日期: Jun 18, 2020
Choices Matter · Story Rich · Multiple Endings · Cinematic · Singleplayer
Detroit: Become Human Steam Altergift·平台:Steam·~ HK$351.67-86%起~ HK$47.93(~ €5.45)比 Steam 省 HK$200.07去購買
Detroit: Become Human Steam Key LATAM·平台:Steam·-81%起~ HK$48.26(~ $6.15)去購買
Detroit: Become Human EN Global·平台:Steam·-80%起~ HK$48.54(~ €5.52)去購買
Detroit: Become Human Steam CD Key·平台:Steam·~ HK$351.67-86%起~ HK$48.54(~ €5.52)去購買
·平台:Steam·香港 Steam 官方價~ HK$248.00去購買
香港不可用(1)

以下報價已明確標記為在香港不可用(無法購買或無法啟用),仍可前往商店查看並核實限制。

Detroit: Become Human·平台:Steam·~ HK$282.43查看商店
史低 ~ HK$28.57含 Steam 及第三方通路
正在取得全網報價
心願價
設定後,所選地區的可用報價達到或低於心願價時,會寄送電子郵件提醒。

價格歷史

近 36 個月 · 資料每日更新
全網低價紀錄~ HK$28.572025-12目前全網低價~ HK$62.70AllYouPlay距低價紀錄+119%
~ HK$102.45~ HK$179.18~ HK$255.92~ HK$332.6525-1026-0126-0426-0726-10~ HK$28.57

價格涵蓋 Steam 官方與 39 家授權商店,僅統計正規通路報價。曲線按週呈現近 36 個月的全網低價與 Steam 官方價。

歷史價格以美元記錄,圖中金額按 2026-10-09 歐洲央行匯率換算為 HKD,僅供參考;實際結算金額以商店頁面為準。

01關於底特律:化身为人

在《底特律:化身為人》中,你將引導三名仿生人在2038年的底特律經歷分支劇情。仿生人服務人類,城市則逐漸陷入混亂;你的選擇會改變角色命運與城市走向,即使主角死亡,故事仍會繼續。 Steam 玩家好評率為 96%%,共 228,750 則評價。 Steam PC 版支援繁體中文與簡體中文介面。

製作團隊

大卫·凯奇
導演
大卫·凯奇
French musician and video game designer
代表作Indigo Prophecy · 底特律:化身为人 · 超凡双生
亚当·威廉姆斯
編劇
亚当·威廉姆斯
American video game designer and writer
作曲
菲利普-谢泼德 · 约翰·帕萨诺 · 尼瑪·法克拉拉
開發
Quantic Dream
發行
Quantic Dream

Steam 玩家評價

96%好評壓倒性好評228,750 Steam 評價

近 36 個月記錄最低價

≈ HK$28.572025-12-24 · AllYouPlay基礎遊戲 · 與上方圖表記錄相同;為美元歷史價格,並非區域 Steam 最低價。

語言支援

語言介面字幕音訊
簡體中文是是—
繁體中文是是—
英語是是是
再顯示 21 種語言
語言介面字幕音訊
法語是是是
義大利語是是是
德語是是是
西班牙語是是是
阿拉伯語是是是
捷克語是是—
丹麥語是是—
芬蘭語是是—
希臘語是是—
匈牙利語是是—
日語是是是
韓語是是—
挪威語是是—
波蘭語是是是
葡萄牙語是是是
巴西葡語是是是
拉美西語是是是
瑞典語是是—
土耳其語是是—
荷蘭語是是—
俄語是是是

Steam PC 版資訊 · 2026-10-10

02購買前

語言與音訊

Steam PC 版支援繁體中文與簡體中文介面及字幕;英文提供完整語音和字幕。

操控與需求

Steam PC 版支援鍵盤滑鼠及完整控制器操作。介紹提及 4K 解析度與 60 fps,但未列出系統需求。

03常見問題解答

玩家會扮演哪些角色?

你將扮演三名仿生人:Kara、Connor 和 Markus。

選擇會改變劇情嗎?

會。選擇會影響角色命運和底特律的發展,並帶來不同結局。

主角死亡後故事還會繼續嗎?

會。即使三位主角之一死亡,故事仍會繼續。

8.5
綜合評分
外部評分96%Steam 玩家評分22.9萬 則評價80Metacritic/10079OpenCritic/100
畫面
9
音效
8.5
玩法
6.5
劇情
9.5
內容
8

“Three leads, 40-plus endings and a live-growing flowchart push interactive-narrative choice density to a scale nobody has matched since”

評測總結

Put all six dimensions together and this is a game with razor-clear positioning: it does the thing on its chosen lane better than anyone has since, and it cheerfully hands away everything that doesn't belong on that lane. It doesn't try to please everyone, and that clarity is precisely why it still stands seven or eight years later.

Historic standing and who should buy: the choice-driven, come in

The three leads' fates converge at the finale

At launch in 2018, critics on both sides of the world named it a milestone for the interactive film — GamerSky, in its 9.3 review, flatly said there was "essentially no interactive film of comparable caliber to contend with it." Years on, the verdict holds. That three-arc, live-growing flowchart and the nerve to let a lead die while the story walks on remain its hardest cards to copy. Successors have sharper visuals or finer performance capture, but none have dared push choice density to this scale.

So who should buy it? Narrative-first players who want choices that genuinely rewrite the ending and are willing to replay for different fates. If you relish the control of "this story is mine alone," and the after-credits pleasure of standing at the flowchart asking what the other branch would have done, the game is practically built to your measure. It is not a film you set down once it ends; it is a machine for assembling fate by hand, where every confirm press is a vote for one outcome over another.

Who should skip it, and which version to pick

The PC build's 4K60 further amplifies the performance

Who should skip it? Action players chasing real-time combat thrill who find QTE and dialogue cutscenes too thin. If what you want is dense, immediate feedback under your thumbs, the game will likely leave you restless — a deliberate trade, not a defect, but squarely against your taste, and not worth forcing.

On versions, go straight for the PC build, or run it on PS5, to enjoy the smoother captured performance and crisper micro-expressions that 4K resolution and sixty frames deliver — real value for a game this dependent on facial detail. The PS4 original is perfectly serviceable, but if the choice is yours, the higher frame rate is the one upgrade that materially changes how the performances read.

All told, this is Quantic Dream's best-selling and most decorated achievement: winner of a Japan Game Award, a North American narrative honor and a Golden Joystick for best performer, and a nominee at The Game Awards and BAFTA. Fifteen million copies and a near-unbroken sales curve across eight years are not the marks of a curio; they are the receipt of a game that keeps finding new players because the thing it does well does not age. The one feat nobody has replicated — the sheer scale of three-arc, real-time flowchart choice — is exactly why we land on an 8.5 overall: a flawed, occasionally preachy, mechanically thin game that is nonetheless one of the most genuinely consequential stories the medium has shipped.

展開閱讀完整評測