
全面戰爭模擬器
價格歷史
近 36 個月 · 資料每日更新價格涵蓋 Steam 官方與 39 家授權商店,僅統計正規通路報價。曲線按週呈現近 36 個月的全網低價與 Steam 官方價。
歷史價格以美元記錄,圖中金額按 2026-10-09 歐洲央行匯率換算為 HKD,僅供參考;實際結算金額以商店頁面為準。
01關於全面戰爭模擬器
《全面戰爭模擬器》讓你部署來自古代、亡靈和幻想世界的紅藍搞怪兵種,再觀看它們在刻意混亂的物理系統中交戰。 Steam PC版包含戰役、沙盒、單人、多人和合作模式。 除了100多個兵種,還能建立自訂兵種、派系、地圖、戰役和戰鬥。 遊戲支援創意工坊,也可以直接操控兵種。 評價為97%,來自144,506則評測。
製作團隊
36個月內記錄的最低價
≈ HK$15.622026-03-19 · Steam本體 · 與上方圖表相同的記錄;美元歷史,不是地區Steam最低價。語言支援
| 語言 | 介面 | 字幕 | 音訊 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 簡體中文 | 是 | — | — |
| 英語 | 是 | — | — |
| 法語 | 是 | — | — |
顯示另外6種語言
| 語言 | 介面 | 字幕 | 音訊 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 義大利語 | 是 | — | — |
| 德語 | 是 | — | — |
| 西班牙語 | 是 | — | — |
| 日語 | 是 | — | — |
| 葡萄牙語 | 是 | — | — |
| 俄語 | 是 | — | — |
Steam PC版資料 · 2026-10-11
02購買前
遊戲模式
Steam PC版支援單人、多人和合作模式,可與好友或陌生人在線戰鬥。
語言與自訂內容
介面支援英文。遊戲提供兵種、地圖、派系、戰役和戰鬥建立器,以及創意工坊。
遊戲內容
Steam PC版包含100多個兵種、沙盒模式和直接操控兵種的功能。
03常見問題
戰鬥如何進行?
你先部署來自不同世界的兵種,再觀看基於物理效果展開的戰鬥。
能建立自訂內容嗎?
可以。你能建立兵種、派系、地圖、戰役和戰鬥,並透過創意工坊使用自訂內容。
支援線上多人嗎?
可以。在線多人模式支援與好友或陌生人戰鬥。
“Wobbly ragdoll physics welded into a war-simulator outer shell, twelve factions plus Unit Creator plus multiplayer family couch toy”
評測總結
In an era where every game wants to be serious, then more serious, Totally Accurate Battle Simulator picked the opposite road — wrap a strategy shell around a physics-comedy engine and make players laugh by watching AI armies pummel each other. That choice handed it sole ownership of the "physics war comedy" lane, and four years of stable long-tail operation proved the thesis: a lightweight, shareable, all-ages box of toys can still anchor an evergreen product.
A Pillar of the Physics-Comedy Revival
Alongside Human: Fall Flat, Stick Fight, and Goat Simulator, TABS forms one of the load-bearing pillars of the indie "physics comedy revival." The shared trait of this wave is a rejection of realism and hardcore strategy in favor of visual humor you laugh at the instant you see it — a reaction against the AAA realism arms race and a return to the design sensibility of a childhood toy box. What separates TABS from its peers is the strategy framing — Goat Simulator is pure chaos and Human: Fall Flat is a puzzle, but TABS gives you just enough of a decision to make the chaos feel like the consequence of your own plan, which is a subtler and more replayable hook than either.
The numbers back the vibe. Four and a half million cumulative players, roughly 148,000 Steam reviews, and a 98 percent positive rating is a combination you rarely see in the indie space, where most titles are either high-rated but niche or popular but middling. TABS is a double honor-roll student: high score and high review count at the same time. Landfall's steady output — Clustertruck, Stick Fight, Content Warning, PEAK — keeps the studio's comedic identity coherent enough that "I play Landfall games" becomes a clear label in a player's head, and every new release instantly captures the existing fanbase.
Who Should Buy It
This is for casual players who want to brawl and laugh with friends and family. Local multiplayer is tailor-made for gatherings and couch sessions — a parent and child can sit side by side, build armies, and laugh at the physics accidents together, a "whole family laughing" scenario that is genuinely unique in the strategy genre. It is also for anyone who has snorted at a "hundred Super Peasants versus Thor" clip and wants to recreate it; the Unit Creator lets you invent any absurd unit and quietly turns you into a content creator. And it is a rare "fun but not violent" recommendation for parents — cartoon low-poly art with no real gore, where the comic tone dissolves any sense of violence. That careful handling of a "war" theme into something a parent can hand a child is itself a deliberate Landfall product decision, and it widens the audience well beyond the usual strategy demographic. If your idea of a good evening is two people on a couch arguing about whether ten giants beat a thousand farmers and then howling at the answer, this is close to a perfect purchase, and the price of admission buys the whole thing with no DLC gate in front of any of it.
Who Should Skip It
It is not for RTS players who want hardcore tactical depth and high decision density. Its strategic depth sits well below Total War, well below Homeworld, even below Mount & Blade. If you expect to micro your way out of a losing fight, TABS will disappoint you — once your decisions are made, you are a spectator. It is not for players chasing perfectly tuned competitive balance; broken units like the Super Peasant are a feature, not a bug, and the community consensus is to never sacrifice comedy for balance. And it is a thin proposition for solo players who never play with friends, since the campaign clears in fifteen to twenty hours and the sandbox demands that you supply your own experiments. If you neither enjoy inventing your own scenarios nor have anyone to play alongside, the long-tail value shrinks sharply and the game can feel thin once the campaign is done. The multiplayer is where the real magic lives, and it is honestly the part of the package you are paying for — treat the single-player campaign as an extended tutorial that teaches you the toolset, and the friends-and-family sessions as the actual product. Go in expecting a tactics engine and you will bounce; go in expecting a comedy toy box and it rarely misses.
熱門Steam評測
母語評測選擇 · 10則此語言精選的有幫助評測同時展示推薦與批評,不代表總體好評率;觀點反映的是被評測版本。
我是傻b展開收起
希望繁體中文能趕快上市>3<展開收起
優化很差 常常跳窗 退款!展開收起
1.出中文版 2.推出对战系统展開收起
非常適合直播做笑果、對打同樂 但單人遊玩顯得重複過多、容易油膩展開收起
蠢蠢的AI、詭異的物理、以及一雙會自由晃動的眼睛,笑果真的是滿點 這遊戲非常適合作實況,不用刻意作效果這遊戲本身就有滿分的笑點 希望這遊戲的AI保持現狀的愚蠢,太過聰明反而會損失這遊戲最大的樂趣展開收起
在左邊放一坨軟趴趴像史萊姆的兵 在右邊放一坨骨質疏鬆像缺鈣的兵 然後邊吃零食邊看兩坨營養不良的兵打架 ... 單位因為缺鈣 躺在地上就起不來了 肢體各種不正常扭曲 有水有坑也是直接走過去不會避開 那怕淹死摔死 抱歉,我GET不到這其中的樂趣在哪展開收起
我很喜歡這款遊戲,很舒壓,但我真的很需要中文!!展開收起
為甚麼我不能買這遊戲展開收起
來源:Steam使用者原始評測。有幫助票數是存檔快照,不是即時資料。最後收集:2026/08/14。